- The conflict that existed between Emily and her father in the story "A Rose for Emily" by Faulkner was concerned with marriage. Because Emily's family was aristocratic and has a high status, Emily's father did not believe that anyone was fit to marry his daughter. Therefore, he drove away any and all suitors and kept Emily unmarried for a very long time. However, this conflicted with Emily's desire to love and to be love, and it twisted and distorted Emily's character so that in the end, she became a murderer who kills without any regrets. Emily's relationship with her father was that of a love hate relationship: Emily loved her father for being her father, but she hated him for keeping her away from love.
- The horsewhip was mentioned in the story when the narrator described the painting of Emily and her father. Emily's father was holding the horsewhip, and it signifies that his father is keeping and driving away the suitors using the horsewhip, and protecting Emily but sheltering and keeping her behind him and away from society and away from reality.
- My relationship with my parents differs because I am allowed a greater freedom when talking about relationships. My parents don't care who I am with as long as I still do what I am supposes to do, and in this case, it is referring to academics.
2012年5月24日 星期四
Entry 77: Pressure from Parents
In Faulkner’s story, “A Rose for Emily,”
what conflicts existed between Emily and her father? How did the
horsewhip fit into those conflicts? Why do you think their relationship
ended up being the way it was? What similarities between your own
relationship with your parents and the relationship between Miss Emily
and her father do you see? If none, have you ever seen other people that
have relationships with their parents like that?
2012年5月23日 星期三
Entry 76: White Lie
Colonel Sartoris’s white lie to Miss
Emily about her taxes is an attempt to spare her pride. Judge Stevens
also takes steps to protect her, basically by allowing her to live a
lie. What do you think about “white lies”? Is it morally acceptable to
spare someone’s feelings by lying to him or her? If so, where do you
draw the line? How do you feel about being lied to? Considering the
disastrous outcome of the lies that were told to Miss Emily, what do you
think might be the result of lying to help someone “save face” or
simply just to avoid an uncomfortable situation?
- Many people tell lies to avoid uncomfortable situations, no matter if the lies are good or bad. Some lies are told to deceive, while other lies are told just to avoid awkward and uncomfortable situations. These are called white lies. White lies are usually harmless lies said to help and to protect other people. However, despite it appearing beneficial and advantageous, white lies are actually very similar to lies said to deceive. The only difference is the intention when the lie was told, and it is often very, very hard to tell the difference.
- White lies are usually not acceptable in society, because it is still a form of a lie. However, people often tell these lies because they believe that white lies are appropriate to save face during awkward and uncomfortable situations and help improve social relationships.
- I believe that white lies are essential because white lies are necessary for maintaining healthy social relationships. If we don't tell white lies, it will be very awkward. For example, imagine if a fat person asked you if he or she is fat or not. You wouldn't outright tell him or her that he or she is fat. So you tell a white lie so he or she won't feel awkward. The person wouldn't be hurt too because he or she knows that he or she is actually fat.
2012年5月21日 星期一
Entry 75: Shadow of the Past
In Faulkner’s story, “A Rose for Emily,”
what ways is Emily affected by the shadows of the past? Explain how
Emily has been shaped by the culture and historical period in which she
lives. Discuss her family’s sense of its position in society, and cite
details from the story to support your ideas. Then think about the world
you live in today. Do you think that a similar story could be set in
today’s world? Are there social groups in Taiwan, the US or elsewhere
that are stuck living in the past, or that still reap the benefits of a
bygone time? If so, describe these groups. If not, explain why you think
so.
- Emily's higher social status as well as her father were two of the biggest shadows that affected Emily in the past, and these two things were influenced by the culture and historical period of the time Emily's story occurred in. In Emily's time period, the people of the South looked down on the African Americans. They also believed that women should marry and not be able to do the things that men know how to do. Emily didn't marry because her father drove off suitors because he believed that Emily was too good for them (because of their higher social status). This caused Emily's strong desire to find love, which she couldn't, because she was too old (for that time period). This later on caused Emily to cling onto her father even though he died, and ultimately, the events thwarted and distorted her personality so much that she became a murderer. Similar stories may happen in the present day, in isolated places that have not been influenced by globalization, in places that have kept it's cultural traditions alive despite of cultural imperialism. The places are most likely very rigid in thought, which is very similar to how people in Emily's time period think, and this may result in a similar story plot.
2012年5月17日 星期四
Entry 74: Poetry's Social Function
T.S. Eliot believed that poetry has a
social function. He wrote, “I think it is important that every people
should have its own poetry, not simply for those who enjoy poetry . . .
but because it actually makes a difference to the society as a whole,
and that means to people who do not enjoy poetry… Unless people go on
producing great authors, and especially great poets, their language will
deteriorate, their culture will deteriorate and perhaps become absorbed
in a stronger one.” What do you think about this assertion? Do you
agree or disagree? Do you see any evidence of deterioration in culture
or language? Do you think poetry’s popularity has an effect on such
things?
- I believe that this is quite a true statement. In human geography, there are the terms acculturation and assimilation. Both of these refer to when a culture that is not as dominate is integrated and merged with another culture that is more dominant. Then, as a result, the original not as dominant culture would disappear and people would conform to the society and traditions of the dominant culture. This is quite similar to what T.S. Eliot is saying in his quote. He says that unless people go on and maintain their culture (which is referring to the "...great authors, especially great poets,..."), their culture will disappear (which is referring to the "...their language will deteriorate, their culture will deteriorate...") and be assimilated into a stronger and more dominant culture (which is referring to "...and perhaps become absorbed in a stronger one."). An example of deterioration in culture or language today can be seen when hundreds of native languages are disappearing due to globalization and lingua francas (international languages used for communication, especially for trade and business). Not only poetry, but any and all literary works have numerous and various effects on things such as deterioration in culture and language as more people begin to pursue an education.
2012年5月16日 星期三
Entry 73: No Ideas But In Things
One group of Modern poets was the
imagists. They wanted to describe commonplace subjects just as they are.
The imagist poets were very different from many popular poets of the
nineteenth century, who believed that poetry should be about certain
lofty, “poetic” subjects. William Carlos Williams was one of the
imagists, and you can see examples of his poems on pp. 667-669 of your
text. His motto was “No ideas but in things.” Do you think there should
be any limitations on the subject matter of poetry? What are poems
written about today?
- I believe that there shouldn't be any limitations on the subject matter of poems. There may be many different forms and restrictions concerning the poem's structure as well as form, but I don't believe that this should also apply to the subject matter of poems. Poems are a literary device that allows for people to express their ideas and opinions on any subject matter that they wish to express their opinions or ideas or points of view on. People may but limits themselves, but it depends and varies from person to person. Poems can be on a wide variety of subjects nowadays. It can range from the most traditional subject matters to the most popular and unconventional subject matters. An example of a traditional subject matter may have to deal with religion and plain ways of living. For example, a poem may show one's ideas, beliefs, opinions, and points of views towards its author's god, as well as his or her beliefs concerning everyday life or concerning a particular subject in relations to religion. A more unconventional subject matter may be fashion and clothing. The topics that I would be interested would be associated with dancing, basketball, sleeping, eating, chatting, hanging out with friends, and so on (what a teenager would typically do).
2012年5月14日 星期一
Entry 72: War and Economics
A major war and major economic disaster
marked the first decades of the twentieth century and had an important
influence on the literary and artistic movements of the time. What
similarities can you find with the beginning of the last century and the
beginning of the one we are now living in? What differences do you see?
How do you think historians of the future will describe the past twenty
years? If the literature and art of the beginning of the last century
was called “modern”, what might the label be for the contemporary
period?
- Basically, there are many similarities when we take a close look at the beginning of the last century and comparing it with the beginning of the one that we are now living in. How so? Many people might ask. Let's look back at the question: a major war, the Great War, also known as World War I (as almost everyone knows, the "war that was supposed to end all wars"). Now think, are there any wars currently happening now? Yes, a lot, in fact. For example, there are many wars that are currently happening in the Middle East, as well as Southwest Asia. Then, let's look at the second part of the question: major economic disaster. This is very obvious and evident in the European economic crisis, where countries such as Greece, Portugal, Italy, and Spain are all in debt, and bringing down the other countries of the European Union. This recession in economy in Europe is influencing the economy at a global scale. Prices are also increasing drastically with global financial crises as well as the lack or dispute of natural and raw resources. This is making it hard for many people to survive, seeing as they cannot even fulfill their most basic needs.
2012年5月10日 星期四
Entry 71: Historical Influences
Look at the time line on pages 632-633 of
your textbook and examine the political and social events that went
along with the development of the Modernist movement. Which events are
you most familiar with? Which events are new to you? Choose a few events
that you think might have been particularly influential in shaping the
artistic movements of the time period and describe what they were and
why you think they were important. Do you see any historical, social, or
political events in today’s world that might influence artistic
movements, either now or in the future?
- The events that particularly had influence in shaping the artistic movements of the time period are usually bad and negative in some way. It is these negative events that caused the optimistic American Dream to be torn apart, resulting in people becoming pessimistic and causing and motivating them to change their ways of expression in art and literature. The main event is war. War caused many people to realize that the world is actually not optimistic at all, and the deaths and destruction of war just made people realize just how terrible war, and the world, is. Many people became depressed and pessimistic about the world, that war would not end and they would all have to suffer. Finally, the war ended. Then came depression, making it harder for everyone to survive. Prices inflated, money was lost, and people couldn't live without working themselves until they couldn't work anymore. This caused even more people to fall into despair, and this is when the modernist movement peaked. People began to not only depict the "true" nature of the world, also know as reality, they began to create art and literature that is totally and completely new, different from traditional ways of art and literature.
2012年5月9日 星期三
Entry 70: Social Influences – Entertainment
For most people in the 1930’s
entertainment was limited to listening to the radio and going to the
movies once a week. Considering the information text on p.638 of your
book, reflect on the role popular entertainment then and now - what did it
do for people? - and how it has changed in the last eighty years?
- The popular entertainment then was basically just something that people enjoyed when they were given the chance to, if they had the time as well as the money. Popular entertainment today is very different - it exists everywhere and every second. Most people enjoy entertainment through the medium of music. If you are able to afford for any more entertainment, then people may have books such as novels and comics, and even more advanced ways of entertainment through electronics such as radio, television, cellphones, and computers. How has popular entertainment changed through the last eight years? Well, the popular form of entertainment has improved through the new innovations and inventions of technology. It has become more sophisticated, and has become more widespread. For example, media in the form of television as well as newspapers and magazines can now be found in one place even though the place of production is somewhere else, maybe on the other side of the planet. Also, present day popular entertainment is more open minded, meaning that there are not as many restrictions as there were in the past. For example, girls may now be able to appear in media in "very revealing clothing" compared to the past, and there may be, for example, more fashion shows in the present day.
2012年5月7日 星期一
Entry 69: Make It New
Ezra Pound, one of the great modern poets, once said, “Make it new! Art is a joyous thing.” What do you think he meant by “new” art? Why does he emphasize the “joyous” quality of artistic creation? Why do you think that artists continuously break away from previous ways of doing things and traditional forms?
- When Ezra Pound says to "make art new", he is trying to convey the fact that people should be thinking of new ways to create art instead of copying or imitating the old ways of creating art. For example, people should stop following a certain pattern or format for art of literature. In art, people could try different shades of coloring, different themes, or different moods. In literature, people can try different themes, different moods, or even different point of views. For example, people could be writing in first person point of view, second person point of view, or third person point of view. Another way to vary it is whether the point of view is from that of a man, woman, child, or adult. The joyous quality of artistic quality is basically the ability of the visual or literary artist to create an art that is delightful and joyous, even though the topic or theme may be depressing. The joyous feeling still has a way to be expressed and conveyed. Art forms continuously break away from other art forms because artists want to be able to attract people's attention to their work, and sometimes when the work is too repetitive and predictive, then people wouldn't be attracted by it. Therefore, new art forms are created to attract people.
2012年5月3日 星期四
Entry 68: What's His Problem?
The “critical comment” on p. 662 of your
text suggests that J. Alfred Prufrock has a problem. Now that we’ve had a
very brief glimpse at Prufrock’s thoughts, what do you think that
problem is? How would you describe it? How does the simile in lines 2-3
give us a clue to what is wrong with the narrator? What concerns does he
reveal in lines 37-44? How do you think he feels about women, and how
do you think he thinks women feel about him? What makes you think that?
Use specific words from the poem to explain what is bothering Prufrock
and what his problem is. Do you sympathize or identify with him?
Explain.
- His problem is that he is too self-conscious; he cares too much about what others think of him. He hesitates and vacillates when it comes to decisions because he cannot decide which decision would please others and make others not think ill of him. Lines 2-3 suggest his depressing and negative nature, since he compared a natural, considerably beautiful scene, with an etherized patient. In lines 37-44, there is evidence showing that he's concerned about what others think of him. Prufrock wants to be with women mainly because he feels happy with them. However, he is afraid that the women don't like him that way and that he would take the intentions of the women in the wrong way. So generally, Prufrock is afraid that people will think ill of him, and he wants to prevent that. He is extremely self-conscious and he is never sure of himself. You could say that he has some signs of dependent personality disorder due to his inability to make decisions by himself, seeing as he ponders over possible circumstances too much. He is never sure of himself, even though he may appear confident, as lines 37-44 show (he's dress up, but people say he's thin).
2012年5月2日 星期三
Entry 67: The American Dream
The Modern Era in America was a time of
great change. As you explore the introductory section to Collection 5,
you will find references to the “American Dream.” By now you should have
some understanding of the American mindset, formed by our readings up
to this point as well as your own prior knowledge (from history classes,
etc). Using that knowledge, answer the following questions: What is or
was the American dream? What happened to the American dream in the early
twentieth century? In what ways did modernism change
tradition—especially in what people valued in art and literature?
- The American Dream is the ideal that America is a free country, and that it welcomes anyone and everyone. It includes ideas such as the possibility of being able to own property, which might have been impossible for people back in their home countries. The second part of the American Dream is very optimistic. It is the idea that no matter who, they will be able to succeed if they work hard. For example, they will be able to own property if they worked hard. Another important factor is that people will be able to pursuit happiness; there are not oppressive factors stopping or limiting people from their goals and dreams.
- In the early twentieth century, the American Dream shattered. The difficult conditions of life such as poverty, disease, and death all contributed to this. War that had broken out, as well as depression, brought reality to people, and they started to believe that the American Dream was all only just a dream. They then started to take onto more realistic approaches: first the realist approach, then the modern approach.
- The modernism movement started whole new ideas. These ideas differ from all traditional ideas. For example, it can be very fancy, compared to the plain style that the traditional Puritans used.
訂閱:
文章 (Atom)